Krishna Dallumah & Indran
Law firm in Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
G-2-12, BLOCK G, PLAZA DAMAS, 50480
Compare contractual disputes law firms in Kuala Lumpur. Every firm below is listed on the Malaysian Bar's legal directory.
Ranked by Google rating, then number of reviews. Firms with no reviews are listed below rated firms — never hidden, never reordered for payment. How we rank
Law firm in Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
G-2-12, BLOCK G, PLAZA DAMAS, 50480
Law firm in Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
B4-5-3A, SOLARIS DUTAMAS, 50480
Law firm in Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
L12-12 MENARA SENTRAL VISTA, 50470
Law firm in Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
V03-08-18, LEVEL 8, DESIGNER OFFICE, 55100
Law firm in Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
LEVEL 6 ( WEST WING ) , LOT 06 -27, 55100
Law firm in Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
LEVEL 23-1, PREMIER SUITE, 1 MONT KIARA, 50480
Contractual disputes cover breach of contract claims — unpaid invoices, failure to deliver, defective performance, and disputed liquidated-damages clauses. Malaysian contract law is codified in the Contracts Act 1950: section 74 sets what loss is recoverable, and section 75 governs damages clauses. The firms below handle contractual disputes in Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur.
Section 74 of the Contracts Act 1950 allows compensation for loss that naturally arose from the breach, or that both parties knew was likely when they made the contract. Loss that is too remote or indirect cannot be claimed.
Yes. Unlike English law, Malaysia does not distinguish between a 'penalty' and 'liquidated damages' — section 75 of the Contracts Act 1950 lets the court award reasonable compensation not exceeding the amount named in the contract. Following the Federal Court's 2019 Cubic Electronics decision, the party seeking to enforce the clause does not always need to prove actual loss; the burden shifts to the defaulting party to show the sum is unreasonable.
Six years from the date of the breach, under section 6(1)(a) of the Limitation Act 1953 — the same national limitation period that applies in every state, including at the courts based in Kuala Lumpur.